Phoenix Training

Archive for the ‘L&D Discussion’ Category

My day job vs my passion

Posted by Eddie Frame
Wednesday, January 11th, 2012

Anyone that knows me knows my biggest passion is carp fishing.  I have been carp fishing since I was 6 years old.  Some people might say I’m obsessed and during the summer months I spend as much time as possible down by the lake, going to fishing shows or just buying carp magazines.

I have now been working in Sales for 10 months and one thing that has surprised me the most is the similarity between sales and carp fishing, this may sound stupid but let me explain…

I believe that in carp fishing the most important thing is to never stay in the same place for too long. If the fishing is good carry on and stay put, however, it won’t stay like this forever and once you have either caught all the fish in the area or disturbed the area too much that nothing comes close then it’s time to move on.  The same thing can be said within sales, if you stay in the same area e.g. speak to the same clients or potential clients all the time you will eventually sell to everyone that wants your product or get told to never call back again because you are bothering them too much.  It is very important to move around and speak to as many different industries and potential clients as possible.

During one of my week long fishing sessions I make sure I always have 3 rods with me. These will all be fished at the same time.  The reason I do this is to ensure that I cover as much ground as possible, covering different depths and in different areas of the lake.  Again this is very similar to sales as it is very important to have as many existing and potential clients in the pipeline as possible and not just focus in on one area.  If the area isn’t producing or that rod isn’t in the right place you will leave with nothing. Make sure you have as many rods in the water as possible!!!

Another very important thing is to ensure that you have a variety of different baits in your tackle box, you would be surprised how fussy carp can be.  Something that worked one day could very easily not work the next. In sales make sure that your tackle box is full of different baits/products as this makes it much easier to relate the right features, advantages and benefits to the client’s needs.

Finally, patience! This is crucial – don’t pester people to try to make a sale as this will only lose you potential customers.  If you’re not patient in fishing you will end up scaring anything that comes close, or you’ll probably give up before the fish have even had a chance to find your bait.  There is also no harm in getting back in touch with people after a few months to see if they have any requirements – if it was a need once it will more than likely be a need again.   Just be patient!

Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Share/Bookmark

Is classroom training out of date?

Posted by Martin le Comte
Thursday, December 8th, 2011

I recently read an article written by Alan Matthews of Transform your Training regarding the question of whether classroom training is now an old fashioned way of learning.  His comments were very interesting & I tend to agree that the simple answer is – No!

However it’s a fair question that has been debated much over the last decade since the advent of e-learning and the various other blended learning solutions.

I remember well the time when e-learning was supposed to be the answer. The organisation that I worked in at the time invested heavily in e-learning as a blended learning solution, moving many of the ‘traditional’ face to face development interventions to this exciting, time and cost efficient method of learning.

This was the first time I heard the phrase “the days of traditional training are well and truly over”. As Alan rightly stated in his article, the advent of e-learning has enabled individuals to learn at their own pace, reduce time away from the office and eliminate the associated costs of trainer time, travel and accommodation. It has an impressive list of benefits that convinced many, both inside and outside of the L&D arena, that the future was already here!

But what many people forget is that human beings are fundamentally social creatures. The majority of us live in groups either in villages, towns or cities – huddled reasonably close together – ‘Maslow’s hierarchy of needs’ anyone? As a society we are prone to consider people who lock themselves away and have little or no social interaction as a bit odd.

Blended learning utilising  a variety of delivery methods is absolutely here to stay and rightly so, but as the title suggests, it is about making the most appropriate use of the options available, which includes face to face sessions. If you don’t consider all the options you may be one of the many who fall into the trap of picking the wrong solution, based solely on price. Let me give you an example.

Many organisations that I know use e-learning as a way of training compliance or regulatory requirements i.e. health & safety where, in order to remain compliant, employees need to complete annual online assessments and achieve a percentage pass. What often happens with these annual assessments is that they are completed as tasks, with the correct answers being passed around the office ensuring people pass & the compliance box can be ticked with little or no learning actually taking place.

There is also the added danger that rather than its intended outcome of developing learners’ skills, knowledge, competence and commitment, it turns other learning and development interventions into tick box exercises in the eyes of the participants.

In my experience e-learning is an excellent way of transferring knowledge but much less successful at transferring and embedding tools and techniques. Until there is a way of effectively measuring confidence without the benefit of human interaction, face to face training will always have its place.

As the “is classroom training out of date?” question has remained a relevant one over the last 10 years since it was first asked maybe we need to start looking at other factors that cause people to ask it?

Apart from the name, which I hate – I for one don’t have especially fond memories of the ‘classroom’ from my youth – the issue actually lies not in the environment e.g. the classroom, but in how the learning is being delivered. If you need an example of what I mean by the traditional classroom approach have a look at the classroom scene from ‘Ferris Bueller’s Day Off’.

Today’s skilled facilitators and learning & development professionals deliver group learning sessions that engage people in challenging debate and discussion whilst exploring ideas and theory and most importantly translating the ideas and theory into practical tools and techniques. So in conclusion, if you do it right, face to face training will ALWAYS have its place!

Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Share/Bookmark

Listening – How much do you value it?

Posted by Ross Trigwell
Wednesday, October 26th, 2011

Know anyone that loves the sound of their own voice?

I recently went away on a trip of a lifetime & during the backpacking stage of my travels I met some incredibly interesting people.  One guy in particular gave me real reason for blogging.

A superb story teller, incredible intonation and engaging to say the least. The problem was that others rarely got the chance to speak for any longer than a few seconds, because every time they tried, said guy would quite quickly visualise his own related experience and take over with an “oh yeah, I’ve done that or I’ve been there too” and proceed to interject telling his own story.  You can imagine the eyes rolling, signalling the degree of annoyance.

Fair play to the guy for his self-confidence, however the moral of my story is if you don’t demonstrate a certain amount of self-awareness, you could quite easily have the direct opposite effect to what you are trying to achieve i.e. instead of engaging your audience, you disengage them.

We all do it, the point is to recognise it and strike that balance between talking and listening.

Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Share/Bookmark

What is customer service?

Posted by Martin le Comte
Thursday, October 13th, 2011

Effective customer service should be a combination of robust processes and great people, but I have found it is always the people that make the difference. That was never truer than my recent experience trying to purchase a new wood floor.  It was one of the worst customer service experiences I’ve ever had; it would have been laughable if it hadn’t been so painful and stressful.

  • Deliver – Do what you say you are going to do, when you say you are going to do it.

My flooring supplier missed five delivery slots in the space of two weeks; one of the missed slots was promised as a personal delivery by the company owner.

  • Get it right! – Make sure you have all the information you need to fulfil the customer’s request.

One of the excuses used by my flooring supplier, after the fifth missed delivery, was that they had the wrong delivery address even though I had confirmed it with them on, at least, four separate occasions

  • Take Ownership – Inevitably things sometimes go wrong, take responsibility and personal accountability for putting things right. Do everything you need to do to turn customer dissatisfaction into delight.

If the company I’m referring to had bothered to do anything that they said they were going to do to put things right – I would have simply thought that it was one of those things and been satisfied, they haven’t!

  • Communicate – Tell the customer what is happening throughout the process. The value of regular on going contact cannot be underestimated.

The flooring supplier that I used just stopped answering my calls (over 250 of them) deliberately dropping them only replying via email or text message with more broken promises! It got so bad that I was on the verge of contacting a solicitor to investigate how I go about starting legal proceedings to recover my money. Eventually, by text, I was told that the reason the supplier stopped answering my calls was that he was “profoundly embarrassed”. If he had just taken the time to talk to me the situation could have been resolved much sooner.

  • Follow up – Find out if the customer is satisfied with the product or service they have received. Ask them what you could do better and what they liked/appreciated about your company. This data is vital in improving the product or service that you offer, differentiating you from your competitors.

Needless to say in my recent experience this has not happened in any way shape or form, except that the partial refund promise has, you’ve guessed it, been broken.

On a final note, think about how many people I’m talking to about my recent terrible experience. Trust me, I’m not just blogging about it, I’m telling anyone who will listen.  Research tells us that the people that I tell will tell between 7 and 10 others about my experience to ensure that they avoid using the same supplier. That’s a lot of feedback and potentially a lot of lost sales.  From a purely commercial perspective how can you afford not to offer customers goodservice?

Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Share/Bookmark

How low expectation is often blown away by reality

Posted by BillOsmond
Tuesday, October 11th, 2011
Green Line, Beirut 1982

Image via Wikipedia

I travel quite a lot these days, delivering courses up and down the country and increasingly around the world.  When I find out where I am going or where the interest is from, I do what I think many people do and immediately form an opinion of what it will be like in that particular destination.

Recently I have been on business trips to Beirut and Milan.  When I told friends and family members about these two trips you will not be surprised to hear that most displayed envy and interest about my trip to the fashion capital that is Milan and a good degree of sympathy, shock and, for some horror, that I would be visiting Beirut.  Of the two, my first reaction was that Milan would be great opportunity to train a positive group of fast track graduates keen to learn and a chance to spend a few hours, at least, wandering around the Duomo, around San Babila and spending a few Euros on myself and my family.  Beirut on the other hand is a city that I had grown up hearing about on the news for all the wrong reasons.  Political upheaval, kidnappings, civil war and cross border shelling, have been reported from Lebanon for years.  A business trip to Beirut in my head was at best a long shot.  I consider myself to be an optimistic person and having met our business partner from Beirut, back in August, was keen to see what Beirut was really like.  However, if I am honest, my expectations were not quite as high as they were for my trip to Milan.

After travelling to the two destinations, I can now report that Milan was pretty much as I expected.  Decent hotel near the airport, great group of course participants who were all keen to learn and I had a chance to get into the fabulous city that is Milan, even if it was just for a couple of hours after the first day of the course.

Beirut however was not at all what I had expected.  It is an amazing city and it was an amazing experience!  It surpassed my cautious expectation.  We had four exciting business meetings with positive, optimistic HR teams all displaying an eagerness to learn and develop their staff.  The city itself is reborn after years of civil war and general repression.  Shopping malls, hotels, apartment blocks, beach clubs, marinas, restaurants and roof top bars are all emerging literally from the ruins of the old downtown area, creating a vibrant atmosphere and the back drop to a hugely enjoyable four days.

What struck me after this trip was is the link between this & the levels of expectation that surround training courses and providers.  At Phoenix Training and Development we hand out post course evaluation forms and ask the question “to what extend did the course meet your expectations/requirements”.  Participants often fill this section in by responding – “far better than what I was expecting”, or “way better than I thought it would be”.  I am now disappointed if I read “it met my expectations fully”.  This is the bare minimum we should be hearing.  Do participants attend a course with very low expectations and therefore any half decent course will exceed those low expectations.  I think that this was possibly the case five or ten years ago.  I think that courses used to be rather uninspiring at best and so anything that had anything about it would surpass expectations.  Nowadays the general level of training on the market is better than that but clearly there are many out there who still think that training is going to be a dull, boring and frankly fairly poor use of their time.

What it says to me is that we, as deliverers of training courses and programmes, have to recreate what Beirut did to me.  It can’t change its image immediately, but it must try hard to do so.  We have to create lively environments, create challenges by testing the participants but not making it bland and obvious, maintain high levels of enthusiasm and positivity, make sure that every participant gets what he or she requires in order that they view the training as an experience and not just a day out of the office.  I have a group at the end of the week that, from what I have heard pre course, are not expecting too much!  My role is to make sure that they leave the course blown away by the experience and with the fact that their expectations were totally wrong.

To see more pictures of our trip to Lebanon visit our Facebook page.

Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Share/Bookmark

Did you know that you could be eligible for subsidised Leadership & Management training?

Posted by OliverO
Tuesday, September 13th, 2011

The Skills Funding Agency have relaxed the criteria for their Leadership & Management programme, so more companies than ever before are able to take advantage of funded training.

How do I qualify?

There are a few simple criteria that apply, for a clear straightforward explanation please call Tim, Marina or Edward on 0207 234 0480.

How much is available?

The money available is match funding. So for every £1 you spend, the fund will put in £1, all the way up to £1000 (i.e. £2000 – worth of training)

What training can the grant be used for?

The training can address any aspect of Leadership or Management as long as it can be described as ‘enhancing strategic or people leadership skills with the aim of fostering business growth.’

Phoenix offers several open courses (for details click here) that would be suitable for this grant, or we can provide a tailored solution just for you. Typical topics clients are covering include:

  • Creating & Communicating Vision, Values & Organisational Culture
  • Setting Ground Rules & Expectations for your People
  • Developing an Effective Leadership & Management Style
  • Planning & Developing High Performing Teams
  • Feedback & Performance Management
  • Situational Leadership

The fund is finite, so we recommend you get in touch as soon as possible. We’d be delighted to talk you through the opportunity.

Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Share/Bookmark

Knowing & Developing Your People

Posted by MarinaWirkner
Wednesday, August 17th, 2011
Be Different

Image by Vermin Inc via Flickr

How well do you know your people? Do you know how to develop your staff? What makes one person tick but the other not? What motivates your people? Are your team members all motivated the same way? I guess not, what motivates one person does not necessary mean that it will also motivate someone else.  As we all know we are different, we like different things, we are naturally drawn to certain people more others, we have our own individual drivers and we all behave differently in certain situations. Now this does not mean one person is better than another it just means we have individual preferences which influence the way we act.

This takes me right to the heart of using psychometric & behavioural tools in the work place. I recently completed my Myers-Briggs (MBTI) questionnaire and it made me realise why I sometimes behave the way I do but I also realised where I get my energy from, what inspires me, how I take information in and what my behavioural preferences are. It also gave me a really clear insight into what I do naturally and how I act under stress and the impact that this can have.

I recently observed an MBTI Team Event and found people warm very quickly to the idea of this particular tool. People are usually interested in their own preferences and behaviours and the impact they can have with their work colleagues and/or friends. The training session was very facilitative and discussion led, enabling everyone to understand their own preference and also that of their colleagues. At the end of the day Lawrence, our Senior Learning Consultant  created a team chart for everyone to add their individual “best fit” to, which provided a clear view of where the team’s strength and development areas lie.  This was something they could refer to on an ongoing basis and served as a reminder for the whole team.

MBTI is often used for team development days to improve internal and external communication and to help understand yourself and colleagues. From a manager’s perspective if you know what motivates your people it will help you to challenge, satisfy and develop them appropriately. It will also help you to see the strengths in your team and its many diverse characteristics.

For a better idea of what we can cover in this type of event, please have a look at our recommended MBTI course “Myers-Briggs – Optimising Team Performance” which will be specifically tailored to any organisation. http://www.phoenix-training.co.uk/courses/Team-development/Myers-Briggs-Optimising-Team-Performance

Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Share/Bookmark

Commercial Awareness

Posted by JamesAshburnham
Monday, August 1st, 2011
The Bigger Picture

Image by krossbow via Flickr

In these challenging economic times, the importance of having commercially aware staff has been brought into sharp focus.  When I worked for Virgin Active (many years ago), the CEO would hold a monthly meeting in which he’d share with all his staff the latest facts and figures; milestones passed and targets yet to be achieved.  As someone with a background in sales I always appreciated this, but many of my colleagues would grumble about attending, believing that because they worked in customer service, or marketing they didn’t need to understand how well the company was performing, or what the current EBITDA was.

Unfortunately, this attitude can be found in many organisations, particularly larger ones, and can be hugely damaging.  Sales people lacking in commercial awareness may end up passing on goods or services at a loss to the company, whilst still managing to achieve their own targets.  Customer service reps may habitually give away more value than the company can really afford.  Developers may spend valuable time on a project that their employer will struggle to bring to market, yet all these staff may still wrongly believe they are doing what’s best for their employer; worse still, they maybe unwittingly creating unnecessary work for colleagues in other departments – especially in organisations where ‘siloing’ is the norm.  All this leads to inefficiency, and ultimately affects the bottom line.

Commercial awareness goes beyond just understanding the financial position.  It means ensuring that all staff understand their leadership’s vision and are working together to achieve the same goals.  It means each department engaging the others when making decisions.  It means working smart, for everyone’s benefit.  It means seeing the bigger picture.

Phoenix run a challenging, business specific and highly practical commercial awareness programme.  We can also help leaders and managers communicate their vision more effectively, and think more strategically.  For more information, please get in touch.

Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Share/Bookmark

The Importance of a Joined-Up Implementation Strategy

Posted by TimHolmes
Monday, July 25th, 2011
Enchantress

Image by Klearchos Kapoutsis via Flickr

“I’d rather be a boat with a motor than a cork on the water”.  So says the Global HR Director of a FTSE 250 company that I have had the pleasure of meeting on a few occasions.  After the crash of 2008 his company took a battering as some of its core markets declined, and newly arriving into the business he was clear that sales skills and particularly sales proactivity needed sharpening up: they could bob about helplessly on the tide of the global manufacturing market; or they could fire up the engine, set a clear new course and at least drive the business in the right direction, even if market forces made it tough going in the short term.

I’ve been reminded of his maxim lately as I have observed with admiration the joined-up corporate thinking of one of Phoenix’s Sales Academy clients – a business that has engaged with us to help instil a consistent and up-to-date sales approach in its people.  We have worked with this company for several months in the past year, tailoring and delivering workshops in core sales skills, negotiation, objection handling, and other key areas.  Senior management has embraced the project, and directors have involved themselves with enthusiasm in the initial stages, attending the core training personally so that they can understand exactly what the new approach entails, and how it differs from what they had before.

What has really impressed, though, is how they have taken responsibility for their side of our partnership, and come up with a truly interconnected approach to implementation of the learning they have invested in. By implementation I mean what happens internally in an organisation after training.  It’s the process by which learning is embedded into the team or the company once the training delivery is over, and it’s absolutely critical to the success of any training initiative, for without it the learning will not take hold systematically and sustain its effects.

The key people when it comes to implementation of sales training are the line managers who have responsibility for the day-to-day supervision of the sales team.  They need to recognise their paramount role in supporting the learning and providing the environment in which it can take hold – if they do that then this month’s innovation will easily become next month’s habit.  It’s often cited that a new habit forms in roughly 21 days; so you can see how it’s essential to keep the team on-track and practising what they’ve learned daily within that initial period until new best-practice techniques are embedded.

In this company which is currently flying I have been particularly impressed by the Sales Director: as soon as he understood what our expert sales trainers were going to be delivering to his people, he put enormous energy and thought into designing processes that enshrine the new sales methodology at the heart of everything his team does.  For example, he and his Sales Manager take the time each month to listen to half a dozen sales calls made by every one of the team, and evidence is noted on the key elements of the sale (attitude, knowledge, structure, and questioning) and a ’score’ given for each accordingly.  He and his Sales Manager then give feedback and coaching off the back of these observations, in order to keep the sales people focusing on what will make the greatest difference to their results in the long term.  In addition, he has overseen the creation of Product Sheets that lay out information for the sales team to reference, all reflecting the language & structure of the training. Negotiation grids have been created which make clear which variables are preferable to use when striking a deal for each product.  And they are helped and incentivized on a daily basis to apply it, with a newly formulated commission structure that rewards 50% on the right behaviours and not just the results.  As a result he is seeing a powerful consistency of approach which is creating a virtuous circle, with each sales person constantly reminded of best practice by simply hearing their peers around them.

And as expected, this has all had an immediate positive effect on the figures: June 2011 was their best ever month, and the retention team hit over 125% of their target.

But there’s another element to this too, and it is that the organisation as a whole has embraced the new approach, and decided to weave it into the DNA of the company: from marketing materials to product discussions to customer service, the language and structure of their new sales method is constantly reflected and reinforced.  Thus, everything is pointed in the same direction, and there is very little friction or dissonance.

The motor’s running, they’ve set a clear direction, and they’re leaving bobbing corks for dead.  Exciting times indeed.

Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Share/Bookmark

Suits You!

Posted by OliverO
Tuesday, July 19th, 2011
Tailoring: first fit of a jacket. The jacket i...

Image via Wikipedia

Browsing through any number of training provider websites, you simply cannot avoid seeing solutions described as either tailored or fully bespoke.  Those words are everywhere and in many cases they are used to describe exactly the same thing.  Now, I’ve no doubt been guilty of this myself but it was only following a recent experience from a genuine tailor that I actually began to consider what their real meaning is and how as a training provider we need to clarify the difference.

For my 40th birthday, I’d always promised myself a properly tailored suit.   An introduction to the excellent Boland & Banks (www.bolandandbanks.com) got things going and a few weeks later I was proudly sporting a fantastic looking new suit.  Was it, however, tailored or fully bespoke?  A quick look at the industry definitions might help us here:

“A tailored suit is cut, usually by machine, from an existing pattern, and adjusted according to the customer’s measurements,” while “a fully bespoke suit would be hand-made and the pattern cut from scratch, with an intermediary baste stage which involved a first fitting so that adjustments could be made to a half-made suit.”

That also neatly sums up the key differences between tailored and fully bespoke training solutions.  A tailored solution still requires pre-course consultancy to understand individual and organisational objectives, as well as the subsequent refinement of content to reflect these.   A fully bespoke solution on the other hand, would involve much greater analysis of the current requirement, followed by the design of a solution that includes completely unique content.

It’s also worth considering that Phoenix never charge for simply tailoring a course – it’s an essential part of any effective solution without which, relevance and results are impossible to achieve.  We do however charge clients for fully bespoke work, but equally, we are very clear on exactly what a client is paying for.  Our embedded consultancy approach, where we work on a client’s site, is a great example of this.

With such pressure on budgets, I would urge any buyers of training to think very carefully about whether they need a tailored or a fully bespoke solution and also to make sure that their chosen provider is accountable throughout the design process.

And in case you were wondering, my suit was tailored.  It still looks great and cost a lot less than the fully bespoke option!

Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Share/Bookmark